In the intricate and rapidly evolving landscape of video game development, every specialized discipline grapples with prevailing misconceptions regarding optimal practices. For game writers and narrative designers, this challenge is particularly acute, compounded by a persistent cluster of untruths that can profoundly hinder creative processes and project outcomes. These pervasive myths—such as the erroneous belief that screenwriting is directly analogous to game writing, the unfounded assertion that players universally dislike reading, or the outdated notion that a game’s story must be finalized before development commences—frequently surface in unexpected corners of the industry. Addressing these fallacies is crucial for fostering a more effective and innovative approach to interactive storytelling.
This comprehensive analysis aims to illuminate why these entrenched ideas do not accurately reflect the contemporary realities of game development and, more importantly, to detail the tangible harms they can inflict upon a game’s production cycle. Drawing upon the expertise of leading practitioners in the field, this article provides a vital explainer for both individual game writers and the studios employing them, advocating for a paradigm shift in how game narratives are conceived, developed, and integrated.
The Evolution of Narrative in Interactive Media
To fully grasp the origins and persistence of these myths, it is essential to understand the historical trajectory of narrative in video games. In the nascent stages of the industry, particularly during the arcade and early console eras (1970s-1980s), storytelling was largely rudimentary, often relegated to instruction manuals or brief introductory text. Gameplay mechanics were paramount, and narrative served primarily as a thin veneer to justify action, such as rescuing a princess or thwarting an alien invasion. The role of a dedicated "writer" was virtually non-existent; designers typically crafted whatever minimal plot was required.
The advent of adventure games (e.g., Zork, King’s Quest) and early role-playing games (e.g., Ultima, Wizardry) in the 1980s marked a significant turning point. These genres placed a greater emphasis on world-building, character interaction, and branching choices, demanding more sophisticated textual content. However, even then, narrative responsibilities often fell to lead designers or programmers who possessed a knack for storytelling rather than formally trained writers. The film and television industries, with their established narrative structures and professional writing roles, served as the primary cultural touchstones for storytelling, leading to an unconscious transposition of their methodologies onto the burgeoning game medium.
The 1990s and early 2000s saw a further escalation in narrative ambition, fueled by advancing technology that allowed for richer graphics, voice acting, and more complex cinematic sequences. Games like Final Fantasy VII, Metal Gear Solid, and BioShock demonstrated the immense potential for deep, emotionally resonant storytelling within interactive experiences. This era solidified the need for specialized writing talent, yet the foundational myths inherited from earlier periods, and from other media, continued to linger, often clashing with the iterative and player-centric nature of game development.
Myth 1: Screenwriting is Exactly Like Game Writing
One of the most stubborn myths in game development posits a direct equivalency between screenwriting and game writing. This misconception often leads to the flawed practice of attempting to apply linear, predetermined narrative structures—designed for passive audiences—to an interactive medium where player agency is central. The reality, as extensively discussed by industry experts, is that while both disciplines require strong characterization, compelling dialogue, and thematic coherence, their fundamental approaches diverge significantly.
Screenwriting is inherently about crafting a fixed narrative arc, guiding an audience through a story with a singular, predetermined outcome. The screenwriter controls precisely what information the audience receives and when, meticulously pacing reveals and emotional beats. In contrast, game writing, particularly narrative design, necessitates a systemic approach. Instead of a single path, game writers must account for multiple player choices, potential branching narratives, emergent gameplay scenarios, and the often non-linear exploration of game worlds. This requires thinking about narrative as a flexible framework that adapts to player input rather than an unchangeable script.
Bruno Dias, known for his work on text-rich, choice-driven games like Fallen London, likely emphasizes the importance of designing narrative systems that can react to player actions, rather than simply presenting a pre-written story. This involves creating robust dialogue trees, faction reputation systems, dynamic quest lines, and environmental storytelling elements that convey lore without interrupting gameplay. The core challenge is not just to tell a story, but to empower the player to participate in its telling, influencing its direction and outcome. A purely linear script, when forced into an interactive medium, often results in "ludonarrative dissonance"—a disconnect between the story being told and the gameplay mechanics being performed—which can severely undermine player immersion and satisfaction.
Myth 2: Players Don’t Want to Read
Another widely held but demonstrably false belief is that video game players have an inherent aversion to reading. This myth often surfaces as a justification for minimizing in-game text, whether it be dialogue, lore entries, or tutorial messages. However, empirical evidence and the success of numerous text-heavy titles unequivocally refute this notion. Players are not inherently against reading; they are against unengaging, poorly presented, or irrelevant reading.
The success of genres like visual novels, which are almost entirely text-based, directly challenges this myth. Furthermore, many critically acclaimed and commercially successful games across various genres feature extensive lore, intricate dialogue, and compelling narrative exposition delivered through text. Disco Elysium, for example, is renowned for its voluminous and beautifully written prose, which is central to its identity and player experience. Games like The Elder Scrolls series or The Witcher franchise rely heavily on books, journals, and character dialogue to build their rich, immersive worlds, and players actively seek out and engage with this textual content. Even Fallen London, as mentioned by the podcast guests, thrives on its intricate, imaginative prose and player choices presented through text.
Aysha Farah’s experience with narrative-driven titles like Life is Strange: Double Exposure underscores the critical role of well-crafted dialogue and textual choices. In such games, the narrative is often delivered through character conversations, journal entries, and environmental clues, all of which require player engagement with text. The key lies in context and quality. If the text is meaningful, advances the plot, reveals character, provides crucial information, or offers engaging lore, players are often eager to read it. The issue arises when text is poorly written, excessively verbose without purpose, or presented in a cumbersome user interface that disrupts the flow of gameplay. Therefore, the focus should not be on reducing text indiscriminately, but on enhancing its quality, relevance, and presentation.
Myth 3: Stories Are Written Before Development Begins
The idea that a game’s complete story can and should be finalized before any significant development work commences is a relic of traditional media production models and stands in stark contrast to the iterative nature of modern game development. This myth often leads to rigid narrative documents that become increasingly difficult to adapt as gameplay mechanics evolve, technical limitations emerge, or design changes are implemented, resulting in costly rewrites and potential "narrative-gameplay" clashes.
Modern game development, particularly in larger studios, often employs agile methodologies, where projects are developed in cycles of planning, execution, and evaluation. Gameplay prototypes are built, tested, and refined; art assets are created and iterated upon; and technical systems are developed in parallel. To lock down a complete story at the very outset—before the core gameplay loop is proven, before the level design is finalized, or before character abilities are fully realized—is to invite inevitable friction. Narrative, in this context, must be a living document, evolving alongside other game elements.
Andrea Saravia Pérez, with her experience on a large-scale project like Sid Meier’s Civilization VII, would likely attest to the need for a highly adaptive narrative framework. In strategy games, narrative often emerges from player actions and systemic interactions rather than a linear script. The overarching lore and foundational elements might be established early, but the specific stories that unfold during gameplay are dynamic. For games with more linear narratives, the story still needs to be integrated into the gameplay design from the ground up, not merely superimposed on it. This means writers must be embedded within the development team from pre-production through launch, collaborating closely with designers, artists, and programmers. They contribute to world-building, character arcs, and dialogue, but also understand and influence the systemic narrative possibilities, ensuring that story and gameplay are harmoniously intertwined. This iterative approach allows the narrative to organically grow and adapt, ultimately leading to a more cohesive and compelling player experience.
Insights from the Trenches: Veteran Perspectives
The Game Developer podcast, a bi-weekly series dedicated to chronicling the triumphs, catastrophes, and nuanced realities of game development, serves as an invaluable platform for dissecting these industry myths. Hosted by Bryant Francis, edited by Pierre Landriau, and featuring music by Mike Meehan, the podcast consistently shares lessons and strategies that empower developers to hone their craft. The recent episode featuring Bruno Dias, Aysha Farah, and Andrea Saravia Pérez provides a potent counter-narrative to these entrenched misconceptions.
The collective experience of these accomplished writers underscores a unified message: game writing is a distinct and highly specialized discipline requiring a unique skillset that transcends traditional storytelling paradigms. Dias, whose work on Fallen London exemplifies the power of systemic narrative and rich textual engagement, would likely highlight the creative freedom and depth afforded when narrative is viewed as an interactive architecture rather than a fixed script. His projects demonstrate that players are not only willing but eager to immerse themselves in complex textual worlds, provided the writing is exceptional and the choices are meaningful.
Farah, contributing to the acclaimed Life is Strange: Double Exposure, would undoubtedly speak to the intricacies of player choice, branching narratives, and emotional resonance within an interactive drama. Her work showcases how narrative designers must craft dialogue and plot points that dynamically react to player decisions, creating a deeply personal and impactful story unique to each playthrough. This directly challenges the linear screenwriting model, emphasizing the game writer’s role in building a framework for player agency.
Pérez’s involvement with Sid Meier’s Civilization VII positions her as an expert in integrating narrative within vast, replayable, and emergent systems. In such strategy games, the "story" is often the history players forge through their decisions, resource management, and interactions with AI. Her insights would likely focus on how foundational lore, character motivations, and thematic elements are woven into the game’s mechanics and systems, allowing for countless emergent narratives without a rigid pre-written plot. This is a powerful rebuttal to the myth of the "story first, everything else later" approach.
Broader Impact and Implications for Game Development
The perpetuation of these myths carries significant implications, impacting everything from project timelines and budgets to team morale and, ultimately, the quality of the final product. When studios operate under the assumption that screenwriting principles are directly transferable, they risk creating narratives that feel disconnected from gameplay, leading to player frustration and a lack of immersion. This can manifest as lengthy, unskippable cutscenes that disrupt gameplay flow, or choices that feel meaningless because the narrative ultimately funnels back to a predetermined path.
Similarly, underestimating players’ desire for meaningful textual content can lead to diluted world-building and superficial character development. In an industry where storytelling is increasingly recognized as a key differentiator, neglecting narrative depth in favor of reducing perceived "reading load" is a missed opportunity to create truly memorable experiences. Conversely, games that masterfully integrate text and lore often foster deeper engagement and build stronger communities around their rich universes.
The most detrimental effect of the "story written first" myth is the potential for massive inefficiencies and creative compromises. When narrative is treated as an independent, front-loaded phase, it often becomes a static blueprint that clashes with the dynamic realities of game development. This can result in costly reworks, forcing writers to hastily adjust complex narratives to fit late-stage gameplay changes, or conversely, forcing designers to compromise gameplay innovations to adhere to an outdated story. This friction not only strains interdisciplinary relationships but also wastes valuable development resources and time.
The antidote to these myths lies in the continued professionalization of game writing and narrative design as distinct, interdisciplinary crafts. It requires studios to invest in dedicated narrative teams, integrate writers early and continuously into the development pipeline, and foster a culture of collaborative iteration. Understanding the unique demands of interactive storytelling—which prioritizes player agency, systemic design, and adaptive narrative structures—is paramount. As the gaming industry continues its exponential growth, exceeding global box office revenues and solidifying its place as a dominant entertainment medium, the sophistication of its storytelling must evolve in lockstep. Embracing the realities of game narrative, rather than clinging to outdated misconceptions, is not merely a matter of efficiency; it is a fundamental requirement for pushing the boundaries of interactive entertainment and delivering truly groundbreaking player experiences.
About the Author
